If you are divorcing, please be careful before posting to social media.
Seeking Closure for Your Family
Contact me today to request a consultation of your family law case.
Sept. 5, 2022
Marijuana in Maryland
Is It Legal Even If It’s Legal?
Like many States, the General Assembly in Maryland enacted legislation decriminalizing possession of cannabis, at least in small amounts, as well as legalizing it for medical purposes. However, these laws fly in the face of Federal prohibitions on the possession and distribution of marijuana. What does it all mean?
Maryland’s Marijuana Laws
In Maryland, possession of fewer than 10 grams of marijuana for personal use no longer violates the State criminal code. The user will receive a civil citation, much like a speeding ticket. The first offense carries a $100.00 fine, which escalates to $200.00 and $500.00 for additional offenses. The sale of marijuana is still prohibited, as is the possession of 10 or more grams, or possession with the intent to distribute. Possession of between 10 grams and 50 pounds is a misdemeanor that carries up to a one-year prison sentence and/or at $1,000.00 fine. Possession of over 50 pounds carries a minimum 5-year sentence and up to a $100,000.00 fine. Possession with intent to distribute less than 50 pounds is a felony with 5-year and $50,000.00 maximums.
The use of marijuana for medical purposes is legal in Maryland, but the regulations are pending. Patients will be required to obtain a Medical Cannabis Patient ID Card. However, there have been legal battles about medical cannabis retail licenses to ensure that these potentially profitable licenses are awarded to a diverse group of entities. In short, it is unclear when medical marijuana will finally get off the ground in Maryland.
Federal Marijuana Laws
Despite the clear trend in States to decriminalize marijuana, in particular for medical purposes, Federal law directly contradicts these efforts. The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 categorizes marijuana as a Schedule I hallucinogenic substance that has no medical benefit. This is the most restrictive category of substances. In contrast, cocaine is a Schedule II substance in recognition that it has currently accepted uses for medical purposes with severe restrictions.
As a result, the CSA prohibits possession of cannabis, even for medical purposes. The penalty for possession is 1 year in prison and a minimum $1,000.00 fine for a first conviction. The penalty escalates for a second conviction to a 15-day mandatory minimum sentence, which could be as much as 2 years, and up to a $2,500.00 fine. Subsequent convictions result in 90-day mandatory minimums, with a 3-year maximum, and up to a $5,000.00 fine.
Distribution of marijuana (other than small amounts without remuneration, which is treated as possession) is far more serious, with less than 50 plants or 50 kg punishable by 5 years and up to a $250,000.00 fine as the starting point. Penalties increase substantially as the number of plants or kilograms increases. For example, distribution of 1000 plants or 1000 kg carries 10 years to life in prison and a $4-$10 million fine.
Federal law also prohibits doctors from prescribing marijuana for medical purposes, as well as for its use in clinical research trials. Banking laws also prohibit transactions relating to the sale of marijuana. Users and distributors face the possibility of money laundering charges.
The severity of penalties at the Federal level presents quite the dilemma for State licensees who may be following Maryland law to distribute cannabis for medical purposes. These licenses gift wrap a Federal distribution case to the Feds. Licensees could face penalties, based on the weight or number of plants, of up to life in prison and a $10M fine for distribution, not to mention money laundering and other potential crimes.
How Can This Be?
Cannabis legislation presents a grand battle between the scope of the Federal government and modern principles of federalism, the latter seeking to restrict the Federal government’s use of the Commerce Clause to regulate industries that are primarily intrastate, such as distribution and use of medical marijuana. The U.S. Constitution holds that, when in conflict, Federal Law controls over State law. While the States need not legislatively support Federal laws, such as drug laws, State efforts to decriminalize activities that are illegal at the Federal level will not impact on the Federal government’s ability to enforce its laws.
At present the Federal Government has not interfered with the efforts of States to regulate medical marijuana use (or legalization for personal use) within its borders, nor have the Feds arrested individuals for drug possession that would not otherwise violate State criminal law. In recent years, the Department of Justice released various Memoranda describing the role that DOJ intends to take on this issue. Most significantly, the 2013 Cole Memorandum (link opens PDF document) outlined that the Federal government would focus enforcement of cannabis prohibitions on areas such as:
distribution to minors,
use or distribution on Federal lands and property,
revenue that could fund criminal enterprises, cartels, and gangs,
violence and firearm usage connected to cultivation and distribution of cannabis, and
transport of cannabis from states where it is legal to states where it is illegal
While the Cole Memorandum provides some cover for citizens who may buy or sell marijuana legally within the borders of their home state, it does not carry the force of law. In fact, with the change in administrations, the current Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, has expressed significant reservations about the legalization of marijuana.
What Are The Effects Of Cannabis Legalization?
Current studies about the effects of marijuana legalization are not particularly compelling one way or another. A survey in Washington state concluded that legalization had no measurable impact on marijuana usage among teens. Another paper posited that legalization had minimal effects on usage and outcomes in Washington, Colorado, Alaska, and Oregon; however, insufficient time had elapsed to obtain firm results.
On the other hand, statistics in Colorado show that ER visits due to marijuana usage have increased by 29% and hospital visits have tripled since legalization.
Unfortunately, clinical studies, which would better demonstrate the effects of cannabis on individuals, are not permitted due to the Schedule I categorization. Without the benefit of clinical trials, the surveys listed above have limited value in making health or safety determinations about marijuana usage, be it for personal or medical use.
What Does The Future Hold?
Despite uncertainty about the long-term effects of the decriminalization or legalization of marijuana, the clear trend among States is to move forward. Maryland has pending legislation that would legalize personal use. There is also support for granting medical use privileges to heroin addicts. Whether these proposals have merit or not, the clash between Federal and State laws is untenable.
At the Federal level, the CARERS Act would bring the Federal law in sync with State laws. The CSA would be amended to categorize cannabis as a Schedule II substance, allowing for prescriptions by doctors and clinical studies to determine the value of cannabis for medical purposes. Further, CARERS would defer to State law regarding the distribution and use of marijuana.
What do you think? Did Nixon get it right in 1970? Or is this an unnecessary intrusion on State’s rights by the Feds? I welcome your thoughts on Twitter or Facebook.
Mom and dad separated two years ago. They have a 5-year-old son, Billy. They have been making visitation transfers on Fridays at 7:00 p.m.
In Maryland, there are two ways to obtain a divorce without a finding of fault against one of the parties. A no-fault divorce can be granted based upon a 12-month separation or by mutual consent.